You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How useful are housekeeping genes? Variable expression in melanoma metastases
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, October 2007
|
DOI | 10.1515/cclm.2007.303 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bertil Kågedal, Malin Farnebäck, Annika Håkansson, Bertil Gustafsson, Leif Håkansson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Poland | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 33% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 1 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
Energy | 1 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 17% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2017.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
#1,203
of 2,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,157
of 89,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,902 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.