↓ Skip to main content

Risk Perceptions Among Participants Undergoing Lung Cancer Screening: Baseline Results from the National Lung Screening Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
Risk Perceptions Among Participants Undergoing Lung Cancer Screening: Baseline Results from the National Lung Screening Trial
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12160-009-9112-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elyse R. Park, Jamie S. Ostroff, William Rakowski, Ilana F. Gareen, Michael A. Diefenbach, Sandra Feibelmann, Nancy A. Rigotti

Abstract

Lung cancer screening could present a "teachable moment" for promoting smoking cessation and relapse prevention. Understanding the risk perceptions of older individuals who undergo screening will guide these efforts.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 93 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 20%
Student > Master 16 17%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 29%
Psychology 17 18%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 25 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2013.
All research outputs
#3,532,522
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#360
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,691
of 90,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.