↓ Skip to main content

Time-dependent thresholds for torpor initiation in the rufous hummingbird (Selasphorus rufus)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology B, April 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Time-dependent thresholds for torpor initiation in the rufous hummingbird (Selasphorus rufus)
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology B, April 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00357531
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara M. Hiebert

Abstract

Three models for torpor initiation were tested in rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus) during moult, when these birds appear to avoid the use of torpor. In model 1, the level of energy reserves at which torpor is initiated (the "threshold") remains constant throughout the night. In model 2, the threshold declines throughout the night, at a constant rate equivalent to the rate at which energy reserves are depleted during torpor. In model 3, the threshold declines at a rate equivalent to the rate of energy reserve depletion during torpor for most of the night, but at a higher rate (corresponding to the rate of energy expenditure during normothermia) during the final 2 h of the night, when these birds are usually normothermic. Model 1 predicts the most frequent and longest bouts of torpor, whereas model 3 predicts the fewest and shortest bouts. To determine the thresholds for each of 12 birds, food supply was manipulated to induce entry into torpor at different times on successive nights. Threshold slopes matched the predictions of model 3 most closely. Calculations comparing observed incidence of torpor with the predictions of model 1 show that the actual, time-dependent threshold for torpor initiation resulted in a 72% reduction in the number of torpor bouts compared with the number of torpor bouts that should have been initiated by a constant threshold. The advantage of a time-dependent threshold is that, although torpor is initiated when needed to prevent energy reserves from falling below a critical level, the amount of time spent in torpor can be minimized.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
Australia 1 4%
Unknown 20 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Unspecified 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Professor 3 13%
Other 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 74%
Unspecified 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,094,653
of 24,395,432 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#83
of 840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,046
of 19,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,395,432 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them