You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reply to Brown and Behrmann, Cox, et al., and Kessler et al.: Data and code sharing is the way forward for fMRI
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1620285114 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anders Eklund, Thomas E. Nichols, Hans Knutsson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 14% |
| Germany | 3 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Belgium | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 23 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 17 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 30% |
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Professor | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 13 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,620,160
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#21,419
of 103,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,542
of 324,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#380
of 909 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 909 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.