↓ Skip to main content

A diffusion tensor imaging and neurocognitive study of HIV-positive children who are HAART-naïve “slow progressors”

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroVirology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
A diffusion tensor imaging and neurocognitive study of HIV-positive children who are HAART-naïve “slow progressors”
Published in
Journal of NeuroVirology, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13365-012-0099-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline Hoare, Jean-Paul Fouche, Bruce Spottiswoode, Kirsty Donald, Nicole Philipps, Heidre Bezuidenhout, Christine Mulligan, Victoria Webster, Charity Oduro, Leigh Schrieff, Robert Paul, Heather Zar, Kevin Thomas, Dan Stein

Abstract

There are few neuropsychological or neuroimaging studies of HIV-positive children with "slow progression". "Slow progressors" are typically defined as children or adolescents who were vertically infected with HIV, but who received no or minimal antiretroviral therapy. We compared 12 asymptomatic HIV-positive children (8 to 12 years) with matched controls on a neuropsychological battery as well as diffusion tensor imaging in a masked region of interest analysis focusing on the corpus callosum, internal capsule and superior longitudinal fasciculus. The "slow progressor" group performed significantly worse than controls on the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence Verbal and Performance IQ scales, and on standardised tests of visuospatial processing, visual memory and executive functioning. "Slow progressors" had lower fractional anisotropy (FA), higher mean diffusivity (MD) and radial diffusivity (RD) in the corpus callosum (p= <0.05), and increased MD in the superior longitudinal fasciculus, compared to controls. A correlation was found between poor performance on a test of executive function and a test of attention with corpus callosum FA, and a test of executive function with lowered FA in the superior longitudinal fasiculus. These data suggest that demyelination as reflected by the increase in RD may be a prominent disease process in paediatric HIV infection.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 4 4%
United States 4 4%
Netherlands 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Zambia 1 <1%
Unknown 92 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Professor 6 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 17 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 30%
Psychology 21 20%
Neuroscience 10 10%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 20 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,285,728
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroVirology
#517
of 925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,435
of 163,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroVirology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 925 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.