↓ Skip to main content

Maximal lactate steady state, critical power and EMG during cycling

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, September 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
392 Mendeley
Title
Maximal lactate steady state, critical power and EMG during cycling
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, September 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00421-002-0703-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jamie S. Pringle, Andrew M. Jones

Abstract

We hypothesised that: (1) the maximal lactate steady state (MLSS), critical power (CP) and electromyographic fatigue threshold (EMG(FT)) occur at the same power output in cycling exercise, and (2) exercise above the power output at MLSS (P-MLSS) results in continued increases in oxygen uptake (VO(2)), blood lactate concentration ([La]) and integrated electromyogram (iEMG) with time. Eight healthy subjects [mean (SD) age 25 (3) years, body mass 72.1 (8.2) kg] performed a series of laboratory tests for the determination of MLSS, CP and EMG(FT). The CP was determined from four exhaustive trials of between 2 and 15 min duration. The MLSS was determined as the highest power output at which the increase in blood [La] was less than 1.0 mM across the last 20 min of a series of 30-min trials. The EMG(FT) was determined from four trials of 2 min duration at different power outputs. The surface electromyogram was recorded continuously from the vastus lateralis muscle. The CP was significantly higher than the P-MLSS [242 (25) vs. 222 (23) W; P<0.05], although the two variables were strongly correlated (r=0.95; P<0.01). The EMG(FT) could not be determined in 50% of the subjects. Blood [La], VO(2) and minute ventilation all increased significantly with time for exercise at power outputs above the P-MLSS. In conclusion, the P-MLSS, and not the CP, represents the upper limit of the heavy exercise domain in cycling. During exercise above the P-MLSS, there is no association between changes in iEMG and increases in VO(2) and blood [La] with time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 392 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 6 2%
United Kingdom 5 1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 373 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 20%
Student > Bachelor 62 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 15%
Researcher 35 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 5%
Other 84 21%
Unknown 51 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 205 52%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 7%
Engineering 10 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 2%
Other 31 8%
Unknown 68 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,714,335
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,941
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,245
of 49,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.