↓ Skip to main content

Space physiology VI: exercise, artificial gravity, and countermeasure development for prolonged space flight

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
Title
Space physiology VI: exercise, artificial gravity, and countermeasure development for prolonged space flight
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00421-012-2523-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan R. Hargens, Roshmi Bhattacharya, Suzanne M. Schneider

Abstract

When applied individually, exercise countermeasures employed to date do not fully protect the cardiovascular and musculoskeletal systems during prolonged spaceflight. Recent ground-based research suggests that it is necessary to perform exercise countermeasures within some form of artificial gravity to prevent microgravity deconditioning. In this regard, it is important to provide normal foot-ward loading and intravascular hydrostatic-pressure gradients to maintain musculoskeletal and cardiovascular function. Aerobic exercise within a centrifuge restores cardiovascular function, while aerobic exercise within lower body negative pressure restores cardiovascular function and helps protect the musculoskeletal system. Resistive exercise with vibration stimulation may increase the effectiveness of resistive exercise by preserving muscle function, allowing lower intensity exercises, and possibly reducing risk of loss of vision during prolonged spaceflight. Inexpensive methods to induce artificial gravity alone (to counteract head-ward fluid shifts) and exercise during artificial gravity (for example, by short-arm centrifuge or exercise within lower body negative pressure) should be developed further and evaluated as multi-system countermeasures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Unknown 200 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 45 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 16%
Student > Master 28 14%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 46 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 18%
Engineering 27 13%
Sports and Recreations 21 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 7%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 50 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2021.
All research outputs
#534,638
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#141
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,914
of 194,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#4
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.