↓ Skip to main content

Endoscopic-assisted linea alba reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in European Surgery, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Endoscopic-assisted linea alba reconstruction
Published in
European Surgery, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10353-017-0473-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ferdinand Köckerling, Marinos Damianos Botsinis, Christine Rohde, Wolfgang Reinpold, Christine Schug-Pass

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 17%
Other 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 19%
Unknown 15 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2017.
All research outputs
#23,196,437
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Surgery
#227
of 316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,332
of 323,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Surgery
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 316 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.