| Title |
A relevant and robust vacuum-drying model applied to hardwoods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wood Science and Technology, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00226-017-0908-7 |
| Authors |
Adam L. Redman, Henri Bailleres, Patrick Perré, Elliot Carr, Ian Turner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 6 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2017.
All research outputs
#14,382,114
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from Wood Science and Technology
#192
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,360
of 311,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wood Science and Technology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 264 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.