You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The UCSC Cancer Genomics Browser
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Methods, April 2009
|
DOI | 10.1038/nmeth0409-239 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jingchun Zhu, J Zachary Sanborn, Stephen Benz, Christopher Szeto, Fan Hsu, Robert M Kuhn, Donna Karolchik, John Archie, Marc E Lenburg, Laura J Esserman, W James Kent, David Haussler, Ting Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 5% |
France | 2 | 2% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Tunisia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 105 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 27 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 20% |
Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
Other | 19 | 16% |
Unknown | 19 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 30% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 18% |
Computer Science | 19 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 11% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 3% |
Unknown | 23 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2013.
All research outputs
#3,167,922
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#2,799
of 5,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,841
of 109,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#22
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.