↓ Skip to main content

The UCSC Cancer Genomics Browser

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The UCSC Cancer Genomics Browser
Published in
Nature Methods, April 2009
DOI 10.1038/nmeth0409-239
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jingchun Zhu, J Zachary Sanborn, Stephen Benz, Christopher Szeto, Fan Hsu, Robert M Kuhn, Donna Karolchik, John Archie, Marc E Lenburg, Laura J Esserman, W James Kent, David Haussler, Ting Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 5%
France 2 2%
Norway 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Tunisia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 105 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 20%
Student > Master 17 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 4%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 18%
Computer Science 19 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 11%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 23 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2013.
All research outputs
#2,657,794
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#2,422
of 4,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,192
of 93,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#22
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.