↓ Skip to main content

Age but not Philadelphia positivity impairs outcome in older/elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Sweden

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Haematology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Age but not Philadelphia positivity impairs outcome in older/elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Sweden
Published in
European Journal of Haematology, June 2017
DOI 10.1111/ejh.12896
Pubmed ID
Authors

Piotr Kozlowski, Emma Lennmyr, Lucia Ahlberg, Per Bernell, Erik Hulegårdh, Holger Karbach, Karin Karlsson, Beata Tomaszewska‐Toporska, Maria Åström, Heléne Hallböök, the Swedish Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Group

Abstract

Older/elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are poorly represented in clinical trials. Using Swedish national leukemia registries, we investigated disease/patient characteristics, treatment choices, outcome, and the impact of an age-adapted protocol (introduced in 2009) in this population-based study of patients aged 55-85 years, diagnosed with ALL 2005-2012. Of 174 patients, 82% had B-phenotype, 11% Burkitt leukemia (excluded), and 7% T-phenotype. Philadelphia chromosome positivity (Ph+) occurred in 35%. Of the 155 B- and T- ALL patients, 80% were treated with intensive protocols, and 20% with a palliative approach. Higher age and WHO performance status ≥2 influenced the choice of palliation. Intensive, palliative, and both approaches, resulted in complete remission rate 83/16/70%, and 3 year overall survival (OS) 32/3/26%. The age-adapted protocol did not improve outcome. With intensive treatment, platelet count ≤35 × 10(9) /L, and age ≥75 years were adverse prognostic factors for OS, Ph+ was not. Male sex was an adverse prognostic factor in the 55-64 year group. We report a high frequency of Ph+ in older/elderly patients, with no evidence of poorer outcome compared to Ph negative disease. Overall prognosis for elderly patients with ALL remains dismal, despite the use of age-adapted treatment. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 26%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 15 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2018.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Haematology
#1,449
of 1,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,404
of 331,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Haematology
#17
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,864 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.