↓ Skip to main content

Reducing patients’ suicide ideation through training mental health teams in the application of the Dutch multidisciplinary practice guideline on assessment and treatment of suicidal behavior: study…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
Title
Reducing patients’ suicide ideation through training mental health teams in the application of the Dutch multidisciplinary practice guideline on assessment and treatment of suicidal behavior: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-372
Pubmed ID
Authors

Derek P de Beurs, Marieke H de Groot, Judith E Bosmans, Jos de Keijser, Jan Mokkenstorm, Bas Verwey, Erik van Duijn, Remco FP de Winter, Ad JFM Kerkhof

Abstract

To strengthen suicide prevention skills in mental health care in The Netherlands, multidisciplinary teams throughout the country are trained in the application of the new Dutch guideline on the assessment and treatment of suicidal behavior. Previous studies have shown beneficial effects of additional efforts for guideline implementation on professionals' attitude, knowledge, and skills. However, the effects on patients are equally important, but are rarely measured. The main objective of this study is to examine whether patients of multidisciplinary teams who are trained in guideline application show greater recovery from suicide ideation than patients of untrained teams.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 200 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 18%
Student > Master 36 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 40 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 47 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 9%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 48 24%