↓ Skip to main content

Humid tropical forest clearing from 2000 to 2005 quantified by using multitemporal and multiresolution remotely sensed data

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
9 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
531 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1032 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Humid tropical forest clearing from 2000 to 2005 quantified by using multitemporal and multiresolution remotely sensed data
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2008
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0804042105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew C. Hansen, Stephen V. Stehman, Peter V. Potapov, Thomas R. Loveland, John R. G. Townshend, Ruth S. DeFries, Kyle W. Pittman, Belinda Arunarwati, Fred Stolle, Marc K. Steininger, Mark Carroll, Charlene DiMiceli

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,032 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 29 3%
Brazil 18 2%
United Kingdom 10 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Other 21 2%
Unknown 931 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 231 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 220 21%
Student > Master 128 12%
Student > Bachelor 79 8%
Professor 54 5%
Other 215 21%
Unknown 105 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 347 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 265 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 146 14%
Social Sciences 33 3%
Engineering 22 2%
Other 81 8%
Unknown 138 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2021.
All research outputs
#931,581
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#14,590
of 103,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,889
of 99,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#48
of 574 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 574 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.