↓ Skip to main content

In Defence of ‘Demand’ Deposits: Contractual Solutions to the Barnett and Block, and Bagus and Howden Debate

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
In Defence of ‘Demand’ Deposits: Contractual Solutions to the Barnett and Block, and Bagus and Howden Debate
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10551-013-1867-z
Authors

Anthony J. Evans

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 44%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Lecturer 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 4 22%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 17%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Decision Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2023.
All research outputs
#16,402,016
of 24,163,421 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#2,238
of 3,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,734
of 201,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#31
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,163,421 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.