↓ Skip to main content

Protein-Carbohydrate Interactions

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Protein-Carbohydrate Interactions'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 A Low-Volume, Parallel Copper-Bicinchoninic Acid (BCA) Assay for Glycoside Hydrolases
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Quantitative Kinetic Characterization of Glycoside Hydrolases Using High-Performance Anion-Exchange Chromatography (HPAEC)
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Measuring Enzyme Kinetics of Glycoside Hydrolases Using the 3,5-Dinitrosalicylic Acid Assay
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 An Improved Kinetic Assay for the Characterization of Metal-Dependent Pectate Lyases
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Colorimetric Detection of Acetyl Xylan Esterase Activities
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Methods for Determining Glycosyltransferase Kinetics
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Analyzing Activities of Lytic Polysaccharide Monooxygenases by Liquid Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Carbohydrate Depolymerization by Intricate Cellulosomal Systems
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Affinity Electrophoresis for Analysis of Catalytic Module-Carbohydrate Interactions
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Quantifying CBM Carbohydrate Interactions Using Microscale Thermophoresis
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Characterization of Protein-Carbohydrate Interactions by NMR Spectroscopy
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Measuring the Biomechanical Loosening Action of Bacterial Expansins on Paper and Plant Cell Walls
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Bioinspired Assemblies of Plant Cell Walls for Measuring Protein-Carbohydrate Interactions by FRAP
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 CBMs as Probes to Explore Plant Cell Wall Heterogeneity Using Immunocytochemistry
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Determining the Localization of Carbohydrate Active Enzymes Within Gram-Negative Bacteria
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Analysis of Complex Carbohydrate Composition in Plant Cell Wall Using Fourier Transformed Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Separation and Visualization of Glycans by Fluorophore-Assisted Carbohydrate Electrophoresis
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 A Rapid Procedure for the Purification of 8-Aminopyrene Trisulfonate (APTS)-Labeled Glycans for Capillary Electrophoresis (CE)-Based Enzyme Assays
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Probing the Complex Architecture of Multimodular Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes Using a Combination of Small Angle X-Ray Scattering and X-Ray Crystallography
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Metagenomics and CAZyme Discovery
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Identification of Genes Involved in the Degradation of Lignocellulose Using Comparative Transcriptomics
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Isolation and Preparation of Extracellular Proteins from Lignocellulose Degrading Fungi for Comparative Proteomic Studies Using Mass Spectrometry
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Erratum to: Colorimetric Detection of Acetyl Xylan Esterase Activities
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protein-Carbohydrate Interactions
Published by
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6899-2
ISBNs
978-1-4939-6898-5, 978-1-4939-6899-2
Editors

D. Wade Abbott, Alicia Lammerts van Bueren

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 26%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Chemical Engineering 2 9%
Chemistry 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2017.
All research outputs
#2,584,905
of 24,340,143 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#459
of 13,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,238
of 428,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#69
of 1,075 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,340,143 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,693 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,075 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.