↓ Skip to main content

Climate change-induced salinity variation impacts on a stenoecious mangrove species in the Indian Sundarbans

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
Climate change-induced salinity variation impacts on a stenoecious mangrove species in the Indian Sundarbans
Published in
Ambio, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13280-016-0839-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kakoli Banerjee, Roberto Cazzolla Gatti, Abhijit Mitra

Abstract

The alterations in the salinity profile are an indirect, but potentially sensitive, indicator for detecting changes in precipitation, evaporation, river run-off, glacier retreat, and ice melt. These changes have a high impact on the growth of coastal plant species, such as mangroves. Here, we present estimates of the variability of salinity and the biomass of a stenoecious mangrove species (Heritiera fomes, commonly referred to as Sundari) in the aquatic subsystem of the lower Gangetic delta based on a dataset from 2004 to 2015. We highlight the impact of salinity alteration on the change in aboveground biomass of this endangered species that, due to different salinity profile in the western and central sectors of the lower Gangetic plain, shows an increase only in the former sector, where the salinity is dropping and low growth in the latter, where the salinity is increasing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Unknown 99 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Master 8 8%
Professor 5 5%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 34 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 25 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Computer Science 4 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 36 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,773,476
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#505
of 1,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,630
of 312,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#13
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.