↓ Skip to main content

Parental Coping in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
Title
Parental Coping in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Published in
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10880-012-9328-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard J. Shaw, Rebecca S. Bernard, Amy Storfer-Isser, William Rhine, Sarah M. Horwitz

Abstract

Fifty-six mothers of premature infants who participated in a study to reduce symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) completed the Brief COPE, a self-report inventory of coping mechanisms, the Stanford Acute Stress Reaction Questionnaire to assess acute stress disorder (ASD) and the Davidson Trauma Scale to assess PTSD. 18 % of mothers had baseline ASD while 30 % of mothers met the criteria for PTSD at the 1-month follow-up. Dysfunctional coping as measured by the Brief COPE was positively associated with elevated risk of PTSD in these mothers (RR = 1.09, 95 % CI 1.02-1.15; p = .008). Maternal education was positively associated with PTSD; each year increase in education was associated with a 17 % increase in the relative risk of PTSD at 1 month follow-up (RR = 1.17, 95 % CI 1.02-1.35; p = .03). Results suggest that dysfunctional coping is an important issue to consider in the development of PTSD in parents of premature infants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Zimbabwe 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 168 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Other 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Other 41 23%
Unknown 29 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 57 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 17%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 33 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2020.
All research outputs
#14,345,282
of 24,099,692 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#282
of 471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,153
of 173,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,099,692 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.