| Title |
Empirically driven definitions of “good,” “moderate,” and “poor” levels of functioning in the treatment of schizophrenia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quality of Life Research, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11136-012-0335-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haya Ascher-Svanum, Diego Novick, Josep Maria Haro, Jaume Aguado, Zhanglin Cui |
| Abstract |
This study used an empirical approach to identify and validate the classification of patients with schizophrenia in "good," "moderate," or "poor" functioning groups based on the assessment of functional measures. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 16 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2013.
All research outputs
#20,210,424
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#2,579
of 2,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,474
of 279,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#20
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.