↓ Skip to main content

The (In)compatibility of Diversity and Sense of Community

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Community Psychology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
26 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
The (In)compatibility of Diversity and Sense of Community
Published in
American Journal of Community Psychology, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10464-013-9608-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zachary P. Neal, Jennifer Watling Neal

Abstract

Community psychologists are interested in creating contexts that promote both respect for diversity and sense of community. However, recent theoretical and empirical work has uncovered a community-diversity dialectic wherein the contextual conditions that foster respect for diversity often run in opposition to those that foster sense of community. More specifically, within neighborhoods, residential integration provides opportunities for intergroup contact that are necessary to promote respect for diversity but may prevent the formation of dense interpersonal networks that are necessary to promote sense of community. Using agent-based modeling to simulate neighborhoods and neighborhood social network formation, we explore whether the community-diversity dialectic emerges from two principles of relationship formation: homophily and proximity. The model suggests that when people form relationships with similar and nearby others, the contexts that offer opportunities to develop a respect for diversity are different from the contexts that foster a sense of community. Based on these results, we conclude with a discussion of whether it is possible to create neighborhoods that simultaneously foster respect for diversity and sense of community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Unknown 146 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 14%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Master 11 7%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 22 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 35%
Social Sciences 42 28%
Computer Science 5 3%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 27 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,151,003
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Community Psychology
#58
of 1,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,413
of 232,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Community Psychology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.