↓ Skip to main content

Difficult but necessary conversations — the case for advance care planning

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Journal of Australia, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Difficult but necessary conversations — the case for advance care planning
Published in
Medical Journal of Australia, November 2013
DOI 10.5694/mja13.10158
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian A Scott, Geoffrey K Mitchell, Elizabeth J Reymond, Michael P Daly

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 98 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Other 11 11%
Researcher 11 11%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 24%
Social Sciences 11 11%
Psychology 6 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2013.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Medical Journal of Australia
#5,285
of 5,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,496
of 315,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Journal of Australia
#64
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.