Title |
Predicting Dysplasia and Invasive Carcinoma in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: Development of a Preoperative Nomogram
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1245/s10434-013-3207-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Camilo Correa-Gallego, Richard Do, Jennifer LaFemina, Mithat Gonen, Michael I. D’Angelica, Ronald P. DeMatteo, Yuman Fong, T. Peter Kingham, Murray F. Brennan, William R. Jarnagin, Peter J. Allen |
Abstract |
Clinical decision making for patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) of the pancreas is challenging. Even with strict criteria for resection, most resected lesions lack high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or invasive carcinoma. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 7% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 40 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 20% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
Professor | 5 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 20% |
Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 64% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 11 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,285,728
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#4,357
of 6,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,834
of 201,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#36
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.