↓ Skip to main content

Predicting Dysplasia and Invasive Carcinoma in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: Development of a Preoperative Nomogram

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Predicting Dysplasia and Invasive Carcinoma in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: Development of a Preoperative Nomogram
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2013
DOI 10.1245/s10434-013-3207-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camilo Correa-Gallego, Richard Do, Jennifer LaFemina, Mithat Gonen, Michael I. D’Angelica, Ronald P. DeMatteo, Yuman Fong, T. Peter Kingham, Murray F. Brennan, William R. Jarnagin, Peter J. Allen

Abstract

Clinical decision making for patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) of the pancreas is challenging. Even with strict criteria for resection, most resected lesions lack high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or invasive carcinoma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 7%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 40 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Postgraduate 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Professor 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,285,728
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#4,357
of 6,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,834
of 201,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#36
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.