| Title |
Immunoglobulin G for patients with necrotising soft tissue infection (INSTINCT): a randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-017-4786-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin B. Madsen, Peter B. Hjortrup, Marco B. Hansen, Theis Lange, Anna Norrby-Teglund, Ole Hyldegaard, Anders Perner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 10 | 18% |
| United States | 6 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 23% |
| Scientists | 10 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 160 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 18% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 20% |
| Unknown | 39 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 46 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,100,765
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,027
of 5,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,679
of 324,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#17
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.