↓ Skip to main content

Automated Detection of Perturbed Cardiac Physiology During Oral Food Allergen Challenge in Children

Overview of attention for article published in IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Automated Detection of Perturbed Cardiac Physiology During Oral Food Allergen Challenge in Children
Published in
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, November 2013
DOI 10.1109/jbhi.2013.2290706
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. Twomey, A. Temko, J. O’B. Hourihane, W. P. Marnane

Abstract

This paper investigates the fully automated computer-based detection of allergic reaction in oral food challenges using pediatric ECG signals. Nonallergic background is modeled using a mixture of Gaussians during oral food challenges, and the model likelihoods are used to determine whether a subject is allergic to a food type. The system performance is assessed on the dataset of 24 children (15 allergic and 9 nonallergic) totaling 34 h of data. The proposed detector correctly classified all nonallergic subjects (100% specificity) and 12 allergic subjects (80% sensitivity) and is capable of detecting allergy on average 17 min earlier than trained clinicians during oral food challenges, the gold standard of allergy diagnosis. Inclusion of the developed allergy classification platform during oral food challenges recorded would result in a 30% reduction of doses administered to allergic subjects. The results of study introduce the possibility to halt challenges earlier which can safely advance the state of clinical art of allergy diagnosis by reducing the overall exposure to the allergens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Luxembourg 1 3%
Qatar 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 20%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Librarian 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 20%
Computer Science 5 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Sports and Recreations 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,960,693
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
#572
of 1,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,677
of 224,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
#11
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,825 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.