| Title |
Effects of cannabidiol in animal models predictive of antipsychotic activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychopharmacology, June 1991
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02244189 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. W. Zuardi, J. Antunes Rodrigues, J. M. Cunha |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 17% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 21 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 9% |
| Psychology | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 34 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2011.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#1,354
of 5,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,217
of 16,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.