↓ Skip to main content

Melorheostosis: A Retrospective Clinical Analysis of 24 Patients at the Mayo Clinic

Overview of attention for article published in PM&R, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Melorheostosis: A Retrospective Clinical Analysis of 24 Patients at the Mayo Clinic
Published in
PM&R, July 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.07.530
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriel C. Smith, Matthew J. Pingree, Laura A. Freeman, Jane M. Matsumoto, Benjamin M. Howe, Stephanie N. Kannas, Mary D. Pyfferoen, Leah T. Struss, Doris E. Wenger, Kimberly K. Amrami, Martha Matsumoto, Mary L. Jurisson

Abstract

Current understanding of the clinical features of persons with melorheostosis is restricted primarily to individual case reports and small case series. To assess the clinical features of patients with melorheostosis treated at our institution from 1972 through 2010. Chart review. Tertiary academic medical center. Twenty-three patients with "definite" and one patient with "probable" melorheostosis based on radiographic criteria. The eligible study cohort was identified through an index database. Further diagnostic confirmation of patients with melorheostosis was performed by radiographic review. We evaluated age at first visit to our institution, gender, affected body area, number of bones affected, presenting symptoms, surgical evaluation, and therapies provided. Average age of first evaluation at our clinic was 36.5 years (median [range], 41.5 [3-68] years). Female to male ratio was 4:1. The lower extremity was most commonly affected (66.6%), followed by upper extremity (33.3%), spine (16.6%), and head (8.3%). One-third of patients had involvement of a single bone; two-thirds had multiple bone involvement. Pain was the most common presenting concern (83.3%), followed by deformity (54.1%), limitation of movement (45.8%), numbness (37.5%), and weakness (25.0%). Most patients had a physician evaluation (87.5%); patients also underwent orthopedic surgery (45.8%), physical therapy (33.3%), and occupational therapy (12.5%). Melorheostosis is a rare sclerotic bone disease resulting in pain, deformity, and dysfunction. An interdisciplinary approach to care should include nonoperative and operative evaluation, as well as appropriate therapies. A prospective approach to evaluation, including imaging and physical examinations, would provide valuable longitudinal data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 10 29%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 8 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,109,447
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from PM&R
#272
of 1,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,850
of 373,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PM&R
#7
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.