↓ Skip to main content

Whole-Exome Sequencing of Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma Indicates Monoclonality with Associated Ductal Carcinoma Component

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Whole-Exome Sequencing of Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma Indicates Monoclonality with Associated Ductal Carcinoma Component
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, August 2017
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-0108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bracha Erlanger Avigdor, Katie Beierl, Christopher D. Gocke, Daniel J. Zabransky, Karen Cravero, Kelly Kyker-Snowman, Berry Button, David Chu, Sarah Croessmann, Rory L. Cochran, Roisin M. Connolly, Ben H. Park, Sarah J. Wheelan, Ashley Cimino-Mathews

Abstract

Although most human cancers display a single histology, there are unusual cases where two or more distinct tissue types present within a primary tumor. One such example is metaplastic breast carcinoma, a rare but aggressive cancer with a heterogenous histology, including squamous, chondroid, and spindle cells. Metaplastic carcinomas often contain an admixed conventional ductal invasive or in situ mammary carcinoma component, and are typically triple-negative for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) amplification/overexpression. An unanswered question is the origin of metaplastic breast cancers. While they may arise independently from their ductal components, their close juxtaposition favors a model that postulates a shared origin, either as two derivatives from the same primary cancer, or one histology as an outgrowth of the other. Understanding the mechanism of development of these tumors may inform clinical decisions.<br /><br />Experimental Design: We performed exome sequencing for paired metaplastic and adjacent conventional invasive ductal carcinomas in eight patients and created a pipeline to identify somatic variants and predict their functional impact, without having normal tissue. We then determined the genetic relationships between the histologically distinct compartments.<br /><br />Results: In each case, the tumor components have nearly identical landscapes of somatic mutation, implying that the differing histologies do not derive from genetic clonal divergence.<br /><br />Conclusions: A shared origin for tumors with differing histologies suggests that epigenetic or noncoding changes may mediate the metaplastic phenotype, and that alternative therapeutic approaches, including epigenetic therapies, may be required for metaplastic breast cancers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#14,057,676
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#9,736
of 12,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,703
of 317,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#174
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.