↓ Skip to main content

The Genetics of Voting: An Australian Twin Study

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Genetics, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The Genetics of Voting: An Australian Twin Study
Published in
Behavior Genetics, January 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10519-006-9138-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter K. Hatemi, Sarah E. Medland, Katherine I. Morley, Andrew C. Heath, Nicholas G. Martin

Abstract

Previously we and others have shown evidence for genetic influences on political attitudes and sociodemographic indicators (Martin 1987; Posner et al. 1996; Truett et al. 1992; Eaves et al. 1999). However, the nature of the relationship between political attitudes, social indictors and voting behavior has not been investigated. While heritability estimates for social and political attitudes have been reported in previous research, the heritability for vote choice has not. Furthermore, if vote choice is heritable, it is unclear whether the heritable component can be accounted for through the genetic influence on related social and political traits, or if there exists a unique genetic component specific to voting behavior. In mailed surveys of adult Australian twins, we asked respondents to indicate their usual voting preference as well as attitudes on contemporary individual political items. When vote choice was dichotomized as Labor versus Conservative, twin correlations were r (mz) = 0.81 (1,661 pairs), and r (dz) = 0.69 (1,727 pairs) consistent with modest genetic influence (a (2) = 0.24). However, multivariate genetic analysis showed no unique genetic contribution to voting preference; rather, the genetic influence in vote choice could be explained by shared genetic influences in perceived social class, church attendance and certain key political attitude items.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Hungary 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 77 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 29%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 41 48%
Psychology 14 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Philosophy 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 14 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,191,906
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Genetics
#353
of 907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,799
of 158,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Genetics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.