↓ Skip to main content

Can further gastrectomy be avoided in patients with incomplete endoscopic resection?

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Can further gastrectomy be avoided in patients with incomplete endoscopic resection?
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00464-017-5550-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hee Sung Kim, Ji Yong Ahn, Seon Ok Kim, Byung Sik Kim

Abstract

Endoscopic resection (ER) is a widely accepted treatment for patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) with no lymph node metastasis. Occasionally, however, additional surgery is needed due to an incomplete resection. The purpose of this study was to detect clinical factors which might identify patients at greater risk of additional surgery after ER and to suggest an alternative treatment strategy for these patients. This study retrospectively analyzed 350 patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy after ER in a single institution between July 2004 and July 2014. Risk factors for incomplete resection were identified using binary logistic multiple regression tests and a classification and regression tree analysis. Residual cancer cells were found in the remnant stomach or lymph node in 96 patients (27.4%). In multivariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.001, odds ratio [OR] 5.619) and depth of invasion greater than the second submucosal layer (SM2) (p < 0.01, OR 3.224) were independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis. Positive resection margin (p < 0.001, OR 7.565), depth of invasion to mucosa (M) and the first submucosal layer (SM1) (p < 0.001, OR 4.219), and size over 3 cm (p < 0.029, OR 2.306) were significant risk factors for residual tumor in the remnant stomach. Of 106 patients who had invasion of the M or SM1 without lymphatic invasion at the time of ER, residual cancer was found in 53 patients. Of these 53 patients, 50 (94.3%) had residual cancer in the mucosal layer and only one had lymph node metastasis. In patients with EGC with M or SM1 invasion without lymphovascular invasion at the time of ER, who had an incomplete resection, additional endoscopic treatment or close monitoring can be performed instead of additional surgery, especially in patients who are unable to tolerate gastrectomy, for example elderly patients or those with comorbidities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 58%
Unknown 5 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2017.
All research outputs
#14,802,093
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,543
of 6,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,053
of 310,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#87
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,091 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.