↓ Skip to main content

Sustainability Balanced Scorecards and their Architectures: Irrelevant or Misunderstood?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
377 Mendeley
Title
Sustainability Balanced Scorecards and their Architectures: Irrelevant or Misunderstood?
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10551-017-3531-5
Authors

Erik G. Hansen, Stefan Schaltegger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 377 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 377 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 14%
Student > Master 47 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Student > Bachelor 22 6%
Lecturer 19 5%
Other 73 19%
Unknown 139 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 137 36%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 26 7%
Engineering 20 5%
Social Sciences 13 3%
Environmental Science 7 2%
Other 26 7%
Unknown 148 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,057,247
of 24,167,226 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#933
of 3,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,990
of 314,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#28
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,167,226 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.