You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical significance of somatic mutation in unexplained blood cytopenia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Blood, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1182/blood-2017-01-763425 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luca Malcovati, Anna Gallì, Erica Travaglino, Ilaria Ambaglio, Ettore Rizzo, Elisabetta Molteni, Chiara Elena, Virginia Valeria Ferretti, Silvia Catricalà, Elisa Bono, Gabriele Todisco, Antonio Bianchessi, Elisa Rumi, Silvia Zibellini, Daniela Pietra, Emanuela Boveri, Clara Camaschella, Daniela Toniolo, Elli Papaemmanuil, Seishi Ogawa, Mario Cazzola |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 29% |
| Scientists | 5 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 268 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 12% |
| Other | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 58 | 22% |
| Unknown | 79 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 107 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 46 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Unknown | 91 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,528,604
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#1,306
of 33,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,995
of 328,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#41
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.