You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experience with low-cost telemedicine in three different settings. Recommendations based on a proposed framework for network performance evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Health Action, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3402/gha.v4i0.7214 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Wootton, Anton Vladzymyrskyy, Maria Zolfo, Laurent Bonnardot |
| Abstract |
Telemedicine has been used for many years to support doctors in the developing world. Several networks provide services in different settings and in different ways. However, to draw conclusions about which telemedicine networks are successful requires a method of evaluating them. No general consensus or validated framework exists for this purpose. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 19% |
| Researcher | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 20% |
| Unknown | 24 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2013.
All research outputs
#18,354,532
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Global Health Action
#1,475
of 1,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,916
of 240,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Health Action
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.