↓ Skip to main content

Upper Palaeolithic Siberian genome reveals dual ancestry of Native Americans

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
52 news outlets
blogs
19 blogs
twitter
192 X users
facebook
31 Facebook pages
wikipedia
58 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
8 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
756 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
824 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Upper Palaeolithic Siberian genome reveals dual ancestry of Native Americans
Published in
Nature, November 2013
DOI 10.1038/nature12736
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maanasa Raghavan, Pontus Skoglund, Kelly E. Graf, Mait Metspalu, Anders Albrechtsen, Ida Moltke, Simon Rasmussen, Thomas W. Stafford Jr, Ludovic Orlando, Ene Metspalu, Monika Karmin, Kristiina Tambets, Siiri Rootsi, Reedik Mägi, Paula F. Campos, Elena Balanovska, Oleg Balanovsky, Elza Khusnutdinova, Sergey Litvinov, Ludmila P. Osipova, Sardana A. Fedorova, Mikhail I. Voevoda, Michael DeGiorgio, Thomas Sicheritz-Ponten, Søren Brunak, Svetlana Demeshchenko, Toomas Kivisild, Richard Villems, Rasmus Nielsen, Mattias Jakobsson, Eske Willerslev

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 192 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 824 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 2%
Germany 7 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
China 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Other 11 1%
Unknown 773 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 189 23%
Researcher 148 18%
Student > Bachelor 116 14%
Student > Master 92 11%
Professor 38 5%
Other 136 17%
Unknown 105 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 310 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 156 19%
Arts and Humanities 53 6%
Social Sciences 41 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 22 3%
Other 105 13%
Unknown 137 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 710. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#29,461
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#2,726
of 98,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176
of 317,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#21
of 991 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 991 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.