↓ Skip to main content

Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
33 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1733 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1603 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters
Published in
Nature, November 2013
DOI 10.1038/nature12760
Pubmed ID
URN
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-213816
Authors

Peter A. Raymond, Jens Hartmann, Ronny Lauerwald, Sebastian Sobek, Cory McDonald, Mark Hoover, David Butman, Robert Striegl, Emilio Mayorga, Christoph Humborg, Pirkko Kortelainen, Hans Dürr, Michel Meybeck, Philippe Ciais, Peter Guth

Abstract

Carbon dioxide (CO2) transfer from inland waters to the atmosphere, known as CO2 evasion, is a component of the global carbon cycle. Global estimates of CO2 evasion have been hampered, however, by the lack of a framework for estimating the inland water surface area and gas transfer velocity and by the absence of a global CO2 database. Here we report regional variations in global inland water surface area, dissolved CO2 and gas transfer velocity. We obtain global CO2 evasion rates of 1.8(+0.25)(-0.25)  petagrams of carbon (Pg C) per year from streams and rivers and 0.32(+0.52)(-0.26)  Pg C yr(-1) from lakes and reservoirs, where the upper and lower limits are respectively the 5th and 95th confidence interval percentiles. The resulting global evasion rate of 2.1 Pg C yr(-1) is higher than previous estimates owing to a larger stream and river evasion rate. Our analysis predicts global hotspots in stream and river evasion, with about 70 per cent of the flux occurring over just 20 per cent of the land surface. The source of inland water CO2 is still not known with certainty and new studies are needed to research the mechanisms controlling CO2 evasion globally.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,603 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 <1%
Japan 6 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Other 9 <1%
Unknown 1550 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 372 23%
Researcher 254 16%
Student > Master 246 15%
Student > Bachelor 123 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 90 6%
Other 224 14%
Unknown 294 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 530 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 258 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 239 15%
Engineering 43 3%
Chemistry 24 1%
Other 113 7%
Unknown 396 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 163. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#254,016
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#14,367
of 99,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,169
of 321,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#171
of 991 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 991 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.