↓ Skip to main content

Maternal Mortality and Accessibility to Health Services by Means of Transit-Network Estimated Traveled Distances

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Maternal Mortality and Accessibility to Health Services by Means of Transit-Network Estimated Traveled Distances
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10995-013-1391-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia Passos Simões, Renan Moritz V. R. Almeida

Abstract

This study analyzed the relationship between maternal mortality and variables related to the use of health services (especially residence-hospital traveled distances estimated through transit networks). Deaths were identified for Rio de Janeiro and adjacent cities, from 2000 to 2002, and were matched by age and socio-economic level to birth admissions without maternal deaths (1 case to 3 controls). The variables used were: type of hospital (general × specialized maternity services), number of hospital beds, nature of hospital ownership (public × private-associated), main admission diagnostic, residence-hospital distance, age, income, and education. Distances were estimated by a geographic information system, and were based on most probable itineraries through the urban transit networks. The probability of death was estimated by conditional logistic regression models. 226 maternal deaths were studied, and another 10 were excluded due to incompleteness of information. The ROC area for the final model was 0.89 [95 % CI (0.87-0.92)]. This model retained statistical significance for the variables admission diagnostic, type of hospital and residence-hospital distance. The death odds ratio for women who traveled 5-10 km (reference category: <5 km) was 3.84 [95 % CI (1.96-7.55)]. The traveled distance measured through transit networks was an important risk factor for death in the studied population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 25%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 22%
Social Sciences 13 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Psychology 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 19 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2013.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#1,433
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,007
of 216,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#26
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.