You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differentiation-defective phenotypes revealed by large-scale analyses of human pluripotent stem cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1319061110 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michiyo Koyanagi-Aoi, Mari Ohnuki, Kazutoshi Takahashi, Keisuke Okita, Hisashi Noma, Yuka Sawamura, Ito Teramoto, Megumi Narita, Yoshiko Sato, Tomoko Ichisaka, Naoki Amano, Akira Watanabe, Asuka Morizane, Yasuhiro Yamada, Tosiya Sato, Jun Takahashi, Shinya Yamanaka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 326 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 86 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 67 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 55 | 16% |
| Unknown | 57 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 139 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 74 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 8% |
| Unknown | 55 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,352,995
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#18,974
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,212
of 321,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#247
of 952 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 952 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.