You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The 10th GCC Closed Forum: rejected data, GCP in bioanalysis, extract stability, BAV, processed batch acceptance, matrix stability, critical reagents, ELN and data integrity and counteracting fraud
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bioanalysis, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.4155/bio-2017-5000 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie Cape, Rafiq Islam, Corey Nehls, John Allinson, Afshin Safavi, Patrick Bennett, James Hulse, Chris Beaver, Masood Khan, Shane Karnik, Maria Cruz Caturla, Steve Lowes, Adriana Iordachescu, Luigi Silvestro, Rabab Tayyem, Ron Shoup, Stephanie Mowery, Anahita Keyhani, Andrea Wakefield, Yinghe Li, Jennifer Zimmer, Javier Torres, Philippe Couerbe, Ardeshir Khadang, James Bourdage, Nicola Hughes, Kayode Awaiye, Brent Matthews, Saadya Fatmi, Rhonda Johnson, Christina Satterwhite, Mathilde Yu, Jenny Lin, Laura Cojocaru, Michele Fiscella, Eric Thomas, Kai Kurylak, John Kamerud, Zhongping Lin, Wei Garofolo, Natasha Savoie, Mike Buonarati, Nadine Boudreau, Clark Williard, Yansheng Liu, Dominic Warrino, Prashant Kale, Neil Adcock, Radha Shekar, Edward O'Connor, Hanna Ritzen, Christina Sanchez, Roger Hayes, Mohammed Bouhajib, Simona Rizea Savu, Bruce Stouffer, Edward Tabler, Jing Tu, Chad Briscoe, Barry van der Strate, Paul Rhyne, Phyllis Conliffe, Ira DuBey, Jim Yamashita, Daniel Tang, Elizabeth Groeber, Jenifer Vija, Michele Malone, Mohamed Osman |
| Abstract |
The 10th Global CRO Council (GCC) Closed Forum was held in Orlando, FL, USA on 18 April 2016. In attendance were decision makers from international CRO member companies offering bioanalytical services. The objective of this meeting was for GCC members to meet and discuss scientific and regulatory issues specific to bioanalysis. The issues discussed at this closed forum included reporting data from failed method validation runs, GCP for clinical sample bioanalysis, extracted sample stability, biomarker assay validation, processed batch acceptance criteria, electronic laboratory notebooks and data integrity, Health Canada's Notice regarding replicates in matrix stability evaluations, critical reagents and regulatory approaches to counteract fraud. In order to obtain the pharma perspectives on some of these topics, the first joint CRO-Pharma Scientific Interchange Meeting was held on 12 November 2016, in Denver, Colorado, USA. The five topics discussed at this Interchange meeting were reporting data from failed method validation runs, GCP for clinical sample bioanalysis, extracted sample stability, processed batch acceptance criteria and electronic laboratory notebooks and data integrity. The conclusions from the discussions of these topics at both meetings are included in this report. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 38% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,094,039
of 25,393,528 outputs
Outputs from Bioanalysis
#98
of 1,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,756
of 322,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioanalysis
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,393,528 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,402 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.