↓ Skip to main content

Reducing the contact time of a bouncing drop

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
28 X users
patent
14 patents
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
20 Google+ users
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
819 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
572 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reducing the contact time of a bouncing drop
Published in
Nature, November 2013
DOI 10.1038/nature12740
Pubmed ID
Authors

James C. Bird, Rajeev Dhiman, Hyuk-Min Kwon, Kripa K. Varanasi

Abstract

Surfaces designed so that drops do not adhere to them but instead bounce off have received substantial attention because of their ability to stay dry, self-clean and resist icing. A drop striking a non-wetting surface of this type will spread out to a maximum diameter and then recoil to such an extent that it completely rebounds and leaves the solid material. The amount of time that the drop is in contact with the solid--the 'contact time'--depends on the inertia and capillarity of the drop, internal dissipation and surface-liquid interactions. And because contact time controls the extent to which mass, momentum and energy are exchanged between drop and surface, it is often advantageous to minimize it. The conventional approach has been to minimize surface-liquid interactions that can lead to contact line pinning; but even in the absence of any surface interactions, drop hydrodynamics imposes a minimum contact time that was conventionally assumed to be attained with axisymmetrically spreading and recoiling drops. Here we demonstrate that it is possible to reduce the contact time below this theoretical limit by using superhydrophobic surfaces with a morphology that redistributes the liquid mass and thereby alters the drop hydrodynamics. We show theoretically and experimentally that this approach allows us to reduce the overall contact time between a bouncing drop and a surface below what was previously thought possible.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 572 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
Hungary 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 551 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 161 28%
Researcher 88 15%
Student > Master 57 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 38 7%
Student > Bachelor 36 6%
Other 82 14%
Unknown 110 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 209 37%
Materials Science 58 10%
Physics and Astronomy 58 10%
Chemistry 43 8%
Energy 16 3%
Other 49 9%
Unknown 139 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 287. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#123,677
of 25,550,333 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#8,194
of 98,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#999
of 316,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#81
of 991 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,550,333 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 991 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.