↓ Skip to main content

Adapted dietary inflammatory index and its association with a summary score for low-grade inflammation and markers of glucose metabolism: the Cohort study on Diabetes and Atherosclerosis Maastricht (CO…

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adapted dietary inflammatory index and its association with a summary score for low-grade inflammation and markers of glucose metabolism: the Cohort study on Diabetes and Atherosclerosis Maastricht (CODAM) and the Hoorn study 1 , 2 , 3 , 4
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, October 2013
DOI 10.3945/ajcn.112.056333
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geertruida J van Woudenbergh, Despoina Theofylaktopoulou, Anneleen Kuijsten, Isabel Ferreira, Marleen M van Greevenbroek, Carla J van der Kallen, Casper G Schalkwijk, Coen D A Stehouwer, Marga C Ocké, Giel Nijpels, Jacqueline M Dekker, Ellen E Blaak, Edith J M Feskens

Abstract

Diet may be associated with the development of type 2 diabetes through its effects on low-grade inflammation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 120 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 27 22%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 35 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,516,483
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#10,644
of 12,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,583
of 224,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#86
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.