You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Adapted dietary inflammatory index and its association with a summary score for low-grade inflammation and markers of glucose metabolism: the Cohort study on Diabetes and Atherosclerosis Maastricht (CODAM) and the Hoorn study 1 , 2 , 3 , 4
|
---|---|
Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.3945/ajcn.112.056333 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Geertruida J van Woudenbergh, Despoina Theofylaktopoulou, Anneleen Kuijsten, Isabel Ferreira, Marleen M van Greevenbroek, Carla J van der Kallen, Casper G Schalkwijk, Coen D A Stehouwer, Marga C Ocké, Giel Nijpels, Jacqueline M Dekker, Ellen E Blaak, Edith J M Feskens |
Abstract |
Diet may be associated with the development of type 2 diabetes through its effects on low-grade inflammation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Italy | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Croatia | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 120 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
Researcher | 14 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
Other | 27 | 22% |
Unknown | 27 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 11% |
Unknown | 35 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,516,483
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#10,644
of 12,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,583
of 224,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#86
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.