↓ Skip to main content

A History of Bracing for Idiopathic Scoliosis in North America

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
A History of Bracing for Idiopathic Scoliosis in North America
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11999-009-0888-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reginald S. Fayssoux, Robert H. Cho, Martin J. Herman

Abstract

The care of the patient with scoliosis has a history extending back over two millennia with cast and brace treatment being a relatively recent endeavor, the modern era comprising just over half a century. Much of the previous literature provides a modest overview with emphasis on the history of the operative management. To better understand the current concepts of brace treatment of scoliosis, an appreciation of the history of bracing would be helpful. As such, we review the history of the treatment of scoliosis with an emphasis on modern brace treatment, primarily from a North American perspective. Our review utilizes consideration of historical texts as well as current treatises on the history of scoliosis and includes discussion of brace development with their proponents' rationale for why they work along with an appraisal of their clinical outcomes. We provide an overview of the current standards of care and the braces typically employed toward that standard including: the Milwaukee brace, the Wilmington brace, the Boston brace, the Charleston brace, the Providence brace and the SpineCor brace. Finally, we discuss future trends including improvements in methods of determining the critical period of peak growth velocity in children with scoliosis, the exciting promise of gene markers for progressive scoliosis and "internal bracing" options.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Unknown 151 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 20%
Student > Master 21 13%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 10 6%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 40 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 47%
Engineering 16 10%
Materials Science 4 3%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 41 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,810
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,190
of 106,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#15
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.