↓ Skip to main content

Dissociation of visual localization and visual detection in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Dissociation of visual localization and visual detection in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)
Published in
Animal Cognition, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10071-013-0699-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lau M. Andersen, Benjamin M. Basile, Robert R. Hampton

Abstract

Conscious and unconscious cognitive processes contribute independently to human behavior and can be dissociated. For example, humans report failing to see objects clearly in the periphery while simultaneously being able to grasp those objects accurately (Milner in Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:2289-2298, 2012). Knowing whether similar dissociations are present in nonverbal species is critical to our understanding of comparative psychology and the evolution of brains. However, such dissociations are difficult to detect in nonhumans because verbal reports of experience are the main way we discriminate putative conscious from unconscious processing. We trained monkeys in a localization task in which they responded to the location where a target appeared, and a matched detection task in which they reported the presence or absence of the same target. We used masking to manipulate the visibility of targets. Accuracy was high in both tasks when stimuli were unmasked and was attenuated by visual masking. At the strongest level of masking, performance in the detection task was at chance, while localization remained significantly above chance. Critically, errors in the detection task were predominantly misses, indicating that the monkeys' behavior remained under stimulus control, but that the monkeys did not detect the target despite above-chance localization. While these results cannot establish the existence of phenomenal vision in monkeys, the dissociation of visually guided action from detection parallels the dissociation of conscious and unconscious vision seen in humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 27%
Neuroscience 4 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 2 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2014.
All research outputs
#472,953
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#125
of 1,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,006
of 301,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.