↓ Skip to main content

A decade of insights into grassland ecosystem responses to global environmental change

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Ecology & Evolution, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
75 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A decade of insights into grassland ecosystem responses to global environmental change
Published in
Nature Ecology & Evolution, April 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41559-017-0118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth T. Borer, James B. Grace, W. Stanley Harpole, Andrew S. MacDougall, Eric W. Seabloom

Abstract

Earth's biodiversity and carbon uptake by plants, or primary productivity, are intricately interlinked, underlie many essential ecosystem processes, and depend on the interplay among environmental factors, many of which are being changed by human activities. While ecological theory generalizes across taxa and environments, most empirical tests of factors controlling diversity and productivity have been observational, single-site experiments, or meta-analyses, limiting our understanding of variation among site-level responses and tests of general mechanisms. A synthesis of results from ten years of a globally distributed, coordinated experiment, the Nutrient Network (NutNet), demonstrates that species diversity promotes ecosystem productivity and stability, and that nutrient supply and herbivory control diversity via changes in composition, including invasions of non-native species and extinction of native species. Distributed experimental networks are a powerful tool for tests and integration of multiple theories and for generating multivariate predictions about the effects of global changes on future ecosystems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 224 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 24%
Researcher 49 22%
Student > Master 23 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Other 10 4%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 39 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 33%
Environmental Science 53 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Unspecified 3 1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 58 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,002,339
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#1,305
of 2,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,939
of 325,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#63
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 149.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.