↓ Skip to main content

About Dice, Bouldering, and Team Empowerment: Running the CompOmics Group at VIB and Ghent University, Belgium

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
About Dice, Bouldering, and Team Empowerment: Running the CompOmics Group at VIB and Ghent University, Belgium
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, November 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003332
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lennart Martens

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 4%
France 1 4%
Sweden 1 4%
Belgium 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 22 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 33%
Professor 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Computer Science 2 7%
Sports and Recreations 2 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2014.
All research outputs
#6,997,643
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,735
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,214
of 228,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#74
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.