↓ Skip to main content

In Vivo Detection of EGFRvIII in Glioblastoma via Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signature Consistent with Deep Peritumoral Infiltration: The ϕ-Index

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In Vivo Detection of EGFRvIII in Glioblastoma via Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signature Consistent with Deep Peritumoral Infiltration: The ϕ-Index
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, August 2017
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-1871
Pubmed ID
Authors

Spyridon Bakas, Hamed Akbari, Jared Pisapia, Maria Martinez-Lage, Martin Rozycki, Saima Rathore, Nadia Dahmane, Donald M. O'Rourke, Christos Davatzikos

Abstract

<br />The epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII) mutation has been considered a driver mutation and therapeutic target in glioblastoma, the most common and aggressive brain cancer. Currently, detecting EGFRvIII requires postoperative tissue analyses, which are ex vivo and unable to capture the tumor's spatial heterogeneity. Considering the increasing evidence of in vivo imaging signatures capturing molecular characteristics of cancer, this study aims to detect EGFRvIII in primary glioblastoma non-invasively, using routine clinically-acquired imaging.<br /><br />Experimental Design: <br />We found peritumoral infiltration and vascularization patterns being related to EGFRvIII status. We therefore constructed a quantitative within-patient peritumoral heterogeneity index (PHI/φ-index), by contrasting perfusion patterns of immediate and distant peritumoral edema. Application of φ-index in preoperative perfusion scans of independent discovery (n=64) and validation (n=78) cohorts, revealed the generalizability of this EGFRvIII imaging signature.<br /><br />Results: <br />Analysis in both cohorts demonstrated that the obtained signature is highly accurate (89.92%), specific (92.35%) and sensitive (83.77%), with significantly distinctive ability (p=4.0033×10(-10), AUC=0.8869). Findings indicated a highly infiltrative-migratory phenotype for EGFRvIII+ tumors, which displayed similar perfusion patterns throughout peritumoral edema. Contrarily, EGFRvIII- tumors displayed perfusion dynamics consistent with peritumorally-confined vascularization, suggesting potential benefit from extensive peritumoral resection/radiation.<br /><br />Conclusions:<br />This EGFRvIII signature is potentially suitable for clinical translation, since obtained from analysis of clinically-acquired images. Use of within-patient heterogeneity measures, rather than population-based associations, renders φ-index potentially resistant to inter-scanner variations. Overall, our findings enable non-invasive evaluation of EGFRvIII for patient selection for targeted therapy, stratification into clinical trials, personalized treatment planning, and potentially treatment-response evaluation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 19 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 21%
Engineering 7 12%
Neuroscience 5 9%
Computer Science 4 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 24 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,467,721
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#6,772
of 12,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,419
of 317,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#147
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.