↓ Skip to main content

Lactase Non-persistence and Lactose Intolerance

Overview of attention for article published in Current Gastroenterology Reports, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 600)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
381 Mendeley
Title
Lactase Non-persistence and Lactose Intolerance
Published in
Current Gastroenterology Reports, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11894-017-0558-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Theodore M. Bayless, Elizabeth Brown, David M. Paige

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical and nutritional significance of genetically determined lactase non-persistence and potential lactose and milk intolerance in 65-70% of the world's adult population. Milk consumption is decreasing in the USA and is the lowest in countries with a high prevalence of lactase non-persistence. The dairy industry and Minnesota investigators have made efforts to minimize the influence of lactose intolerance on milk consumption. Some lactose intolerant individuals, without co-existent irritable bowel syndrome, are able to consume a glass of milk with a meal with no or minor symptoms. The high frequency of lactase persistence in offspring of Northern European countries and in some nomadic African tribes is due to mutations in the promoter of the lactase gene in association with survival advantage of milk drinking. Educational and commercial efforts to improve calcium and Vitamin D intake have focused on urging consumption of tolerable amounts of milk with a meal, use of lowered lactose-content foods including hard cheeses, yogurt, and lactose-hydrolyzed milk products.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 381 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 381 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 103 27%
Student > Master 37 10%
Researcher 26 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 3%
Other 42 11%
Unknown 139 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 4%
Other 57 15%
Unknown 151 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 122. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#345,865
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Current Gastroenterology Reports
#7
of 600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,169
of 324,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Gastroenterology Reports
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.