| Title |
Management of insomnia and long-term use of sedative-hypnotic drugs in older patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.130025 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacqueline M. McMillan, Elizabeth Aitken, Jayna M. Holroyd-Leduc |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 283 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 142 | 50% |
| Chile | 3 | 1% |
| Argentina | 3 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Guatemala | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Grenada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 119 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 261 | 92% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 6% |
| Scientists | 2 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 21% |
| Unknown | 21 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 155. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2020.
All research outputs
#269,309
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#483
of 9,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,947
of 215,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#5
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.