↓ Skip to main content

The Role of the Molecular Clock in Skeletal Muscle and What It Is Teaching Us About Muscle-Bone Crosstalk

Overview of attention for article published in Current Osteoporosis Reports, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
The Role of the Molecular Clock in Skeletal Muscle and What It Is Teaching Us About Muscle-Bone Crosstalk
Published in
Current Osteoporosis Reports, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11914-017-0363-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lance A. Riley, Karyn A. Esser

Abstract

This review summarizes what has been learned about the interaction between skeletal muscle and bone from mouse models in which BMAL1, a core molecular clock protein has been deleted. Additionally, we highlight several genes which change following loss of BMAL1. The protein products from these genes are secreted from muscle and have a known effect on bone homeostasis. Circadian rhythms have been implicated in regulating systems homeostasis through a series of transcriptional-translational feedback loops termed the molecular clock. Recently, skeletal muscle-specific disruption of the molecular clock has been shown to disrupt skeletal muscle metabolism. Additionally, loss of circadian rhythms only in adult muscle has an effect on other tissue systems including bone. Our finding that the expression of a subset of skeletal muscle-secreted proteins changes following BMAL1 knockout combined with the current knowledge of muscle-bone crosstalk suggests that skeletal muscle circadian rhythms are important for maintenance of musculoskeletal homeostasis. Future research on this topic may be important for understanding the role of the skeletal muscle molecular clock in a number of diseases such as sarcopenia and osteoporosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 4 8%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Sports and Recreations 3 6%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 11 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,971,318
of 24,562,945 outputs
Outputs from Current Osteoporosis Reports
#61
of 592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,676
of 314,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Osteoporosis Reports
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,562,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 592 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.