| Title |
Effects of emerging infectious diseases on host population genetics: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-017-0974-2 |
| Authors |
Donald T. McKnight, Lin Schwarzkopf, Ross A. Alford, Deborah S. Bower, Kyall R. Zenger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 29% |
| United States | 5 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 71% |
| Scientists | 6 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 14% |
| Researcher | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 11% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,346,296
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#122
of 1,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,360
of 314,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.