| Title |
Archaeal diversity from hydrothermal systems of Deception Island, Antarctica
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Polar Biology, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00300-012-1267-3 |
| Authors |
Maximiliano J. Amenábar, Patricio A. Flores, Benoit Pugin, Freddy A. Boehmwald, Jenny M. Blamey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 25% |
| Researcher | 10 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,525,196
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#600
of 1,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,032
of 279,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.