↓ Skip to main content

Phase I dose-escalation study of milciclib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with refractory solid tumors

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 2,565)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Phase I dose-escalation study of milciclib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with refractory solid tumors
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00280-017-3303-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandrine Aspeslagh, Kunwar Shailubhai, Rastilav Bahleda, Anas Gazzah, Andréa Varga, Antoine Hollebecque, Christophe Massard, Anna Spreafico, Michele Reni, Jean-Charles Soria

Abstract

This phase I trial evaluated the safety and tolerability of milciclib, an inhibitor of multiple cyclin-dependent kinases and tropomycin receptor kinase A, in combination with gemcitabine in patients with refractory solid tumors. Sixteen patients were enrolled and treated with milciclib at three dose levels (45 mg/m(2)/day, n = 3; 60 mg/m(2)/day, n = 3; and 80 mg/m(2)/day, n = 10) with a fixed dose of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)/day). Milciclib was administered orally once daily for 7 days on/7 days off in a 4-week cycle, and gemcitabine was administered intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15 in a 4-week cycle. All 16 enrolled patients were evaluable for safety and toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicities, which occurred in only one out of nine patients treated at the maximum dose tested (milciclib 80 mg/m(2)/day and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2)/day), consisted of Grade 4 thrombocytopenia, Grade 3 ataxia and Grade 2 tremors in the same patient. Most frequent treatment-related AEs were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Among 14 evaluable patients, one NSCLC patient showed partial response and 4 patients (one each with thyroid, prostatic, pancreatic carcinoma and peritoneal mesothelioma) showed long-term disease stabilization (>6-14 months). Pharmacokinetics of the orally administered milciclib (~t1/2 33 h) was not altered by concomitant treatment with gemcitabine. The combination treatment was well tolerated with manageable toxicities. The recommended phase II dose was 80 mg/m(2)/day for milciclib and 1000 mg/m(2)/day for gemcitabine. This combination treatment regimen showed encouraging clinical benefit in ~36% patients, including gemcitabine refractory patients. These results support further development of combination therapies with milciclib in advanced cancer patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Chemistry 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#527,039
of 25,381,864 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#9
of 2,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,824
of 315,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#2
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.